The Iliad of Homer

The Illiad is not an easy read due to the number of characters and their relationships with others. It's a mental exercise until you get the hang of it. The thing is that you don't have to know every little thing that's going on between these characters to enjoy the story. But if you do want to know, the author has written a really nice appendix to get to the details. It's also really helpful to have Google to look up some of the details in which would be out of the scope of the book to provide. Definitely an educational and fun read and research challenge. Many things that I did not know about the Greek gods and their interactions with mortals on virtually every level. And I mean 'every'. Seems that the gods needed the mortals more than the other way around.

I’ve read several novelized, modern versions of The Iliad but never got around to the actual Iliad (if we can call an English language Iliad “actual”). Or maybe I tried it once in another version that I couldn’t stick with. But I really like this one. I’m only about halfway through. I’m an old man who’s been known to fall asleep trying to read or listen to the most exciting thriller, so I’ve mostly been listening to this while I’m out working in the yard. For some reason, it seems perfect for that. The narrator’s voice and delivery are wonderful and the translation is modern enough that it flows like a novel, but it still has a kind of poetic quality to it. I love the short musical interludes between the books (chapters), which give me time to dig my phone out of my pocket and pause the recording if I want to. My only complaint is that the publisher made an introduction (which I skipped) “Chapter One” so that Book One (The Iliad is divided into 24 “books”) is Chapter Two and so on. Makes you wonder why someone did not notice this and simply label the introduction separately and correspond the chapters with the books to avoid confusion.

This morning, I finished one of the most classic of classics. While the story is excellent, I found the glimpses into the Greek mindset more interesting. How they viewed the gods and their interactions with mortal humans I found very interesting. Homer and the Iliad come up a fair amount in my reading and I really wanted a refresher.

The World’s first novel and my favorite story! Brilliantly translated.

This is a story that seems infused into our world. We know bits and pieces because the story is so good that thousands of years later it still forms part of our culture. That tells you something about the staying power of the story. And why everyone should read it. This is a story about War. Yes, capitalized. But this is not only an epic war between the Achaeans and Trojans over the most beautiful woman of her Age, but a confrontation between the Gods themselves. I feel like the Achaean side is more popular in our consciousness than the Trojan side. Perhaps because they were the victors. We have Achilles, Ajax, Agamemnon, Patroclus, Odysseus, Menelaus, and Nestor. But on the Trojan side really we only have Hector, Aeneas, Paris, and Priam. And then of course there is Helen over whom the war was fought. Then there are the Gods. These moments when we see them speak and interact are truly divine. On the side of the Achaeans we have Athena, Poseidon, Hera, and Hephaestus. On the side of the Trojans we have Apollo, Ares, Artemis, and Aphrodite. Zeus is neutral. Though not as neutral as it would seem at first. He too has his sympathies. The war between the gods really makes the story interesting on entirely new levels because of their capabilities. The edition I read was translated by Richard Lattimore. Amazon seems to have combined the reviews for various editions together, which is not at all pleasing. I read it on an iPad mini and it was fantastic. The introduction explains a lot - for instance, though the war is ten years long, we only see the last year of the war. And we don't see the end that we are familiar with - the use of the Trojan Horse and the end of Troy. Why? Because they are not in the Iliad as linear story. These events are told in flashbacks and flash forwards. And also in other works, some of which are now lost to us. Sadly these lost works seem to fill in a lot of the events that are told in flashback and flash forward. So the Cypria tells what led to the Trojan War while the Aethiopis tells what happens immediately after Hector is killed. These books are all part of the Epic Cycle, most of which is now lost to us. The Lattimore edition also contains a lot of good notes that help fill in the backstory and explain the events going on. If you are interested in literature or in European history, then this is a great book to read. Its impact on our culture is incalculable. It's also a fantastic story.

Nice volume - the 60 page introduction by a classics professor is practically a book in itself. The test is well translated and easy to read in a nice printing format.

Great

Great quality, great translation.

If you are looking for an English translation that maintains fidelity to Greek then this is it. I have purchased both Iliad and Odyssey.

A brilliant publication with an introduction and index. Ideal indentations. Fine paper. The spine does not even crease. The cover art leaves much to be desired however.

Indeed a great translation of the Iliad, that provides the clear text structure of the original. I don't recommend to buy it for the sake of prephrase. The only map in it is taken from other books (like the oxrord history of the classical world) and can be found elsewhere. The explanations themselves do not clear out the meaning of the poem before you read it. After the reading they are meaningless. If you need a reference, use encyclopedias or other research texts. (Google will also work)

A “Ilíada”, à exceção do Javista – autor de Gênesis, Êxodo e Números –, Dante e Shakespeare, é o escrito mais extraordinário produzido no Ocidente, e quem não lê grego antigo pode se valer muito bem de uma guirlanda de ótimos tradutores em inglês, incluindo Richmond Lattimore, Robert Fitzgerald e Robert Fagles. Lendo o épico, temos a impressão de que os deuses são uma conveniência do processo narrativo. Mas o poema raramente nos deixa esquecer que os homens morrem, enquanto os deuses vivem para sempre, contentes na contemplação do nosso sofrer. Zeus não é pai de ninguém; Zeus não nos salva. Conforme observa Richmond Lattimore, os olímpios de Homero são, antes de tudo, homens e mulheres imortais, não superiores à nós, humanos, e raramente se apresentam como paradigmas de sabedoria. Na verdade os deuses se parecem no poema mais com os humanos e os humanos mais com os deuses. Aquiles é máquina mortífera porque almeja a imortalidade de um deus, mas o seu pai humano intima a morte do herói. Assim, Aquiles destrói seres humanos dentro de uma guerra pessoal travado contra a própria morte, a exemplo de uma criança capaz de mutilar um filhote de gato já ferido. O épico em questão é a tragédia de Aquiles, ironicamente, pois ele garante a vitória, mas não consegue superar a amargura da constatação da própria mortalidade. Homero contempla a sujeição da força humana à força dos deuses e do destino; não são espíritos aprisionados na matéria, mas forças ou instintos que vivem, percebem e sentem. “Consideram-se um campo de batalha onde entram em conflito forças arbitrárias e poderes sinistros.” Aquiles e Heitor são figuras bastantes distintas, de vez que não conseguimos visualizar Aquiles inserido na vida cotidiana de alguma cidade, mas ambos glorificam a batalha. Amigo leitor, atente para uma detalhe importante: os guerreiros do épico eram fazendeiros antes da guerra começar; eles já se apropriavam de grãos e frutas como se fossem espólios, na luta com a natureza. Isso contribui para explicar por que a “Ilíada” não se detém a louvar a guerra, pois a realidade, em si, já é uma luta constante, em que nada de valor pode ser obtido sem que alguém ou algo seja pilhado ou arruinado. Assim, competir pela vitória era o ideal homérico. Boa leitura.